Affirming the consequent…

This logical fallacy goes something like this:

If P then Q, Q therefore P

DM:
If the Bible isn’t clear then there will be a lot of different interpretations and denominations. There are a lot of different interpretations and denominations therefore the bible isn’t clear (necessitating the need for the magistarium).

James:
The obvious problem with this fallacy is that there are certainly many other reasons why Q happens (i.e. illiteracy, pride, ulterior motives, etc) and therefore one cannot necessarily infer the antecedent (P) from the Consequent (Q)

For more information on this See (How Heresy Helps)

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s